Jul 19 2017

APPG for Education elects new officers

The APPG met on Monday 17th July to elect the officers of the group and discuss areas for discussion over the course of the next parliament. The following were unanimously elected as officers of the APPG:

Co-Chairs: Nic Dakin MP and Andrea Jenkyns MP

Vice-Chairs: Lord Storey and Emma Hardy MP

The new group briefly discussed the successes of last Parliament’s Education APPG, including the comprehensive inquiry into career progression for young people.

A variety of issues were raised for inclusion in the upcoming agenda and future work of the group, with a full programme to be released in due course. Topics included primary assessment, teacher retention and training, mental health provision in schools, home school tuition, role of school governors and school funding.  Now that the APPG has been successfully formed, the members are looking forward to continuing their work scrutinising the issues surrounding education provision in the UK over the course of the next Parliament.

The meeting was adjourned at 4.00pm and the Secretariat agree to circulate a copy of How well do schools prepare children for their future report with the minutes of the meeting.

Please click here to see biographies of the officers of the reformed group.

Jul 11 2017

Reformation of the APPG

On the afternoon of Monday 17 July, the All-Party Parliamentary Group for Education will be holding a short meeting to elect the Chairs and Officers for this Parliament. The MPs and peers will also discuss potential topics for the future attention of the APPG.

Once this formal session has concluded, we will be able to continue hosting meetings of the APPG as normal. Over the last Parliament, we produced a report on how well schools prepare children for their future, which you can find here, and bringing the recommendations of this report to the attention of the relevant Ministers in the DfE will be amongst our priorities.

For further details about the meeting and the work of the APPG, please contact Anna Wolffe by email at [email protected] or by phone on 020 3642 2754.

Jan 23 2017

Meeting on the Financial Efficacy of MATs

On Thursday 12th January, the APPG for Education hosted Jason Gould from The Education Company, to present his research on the financial efficacy of Multi-Academy Trusts (MATs).

Danny Kinahan MP opened the floor, and introduced Caroline Wright, Director General of the British Educational Suppliers Association (BESA), who gave a brief background on the importance of the MAT procurement landscape and why BESA commissioned the research. With the influence of local authorities receding and MATs continuing to grow, an examination was required into the financial efficacy and sustainability of MATs.

Jason began his presentation with a short summary of Academies and Trusts, and how they came to fruition. He then explained how the research was drawn from a quantitative analysis of all “true” MAT websites and interviews with 455 MATs, examining their current situation and likely future financial trends. He observed that without political intervention, it is likely that in 3 years, 70% of secondary schools and 30% of primary schools will become Academies.

Jason then explored the debate surrounding the optimum geographical size of a MAT, and described how some of the larger MATs have begun to set up regional hubs to better facilitate the movement of staff and facilities. Another key concern is growth and the pressure on high-performing Trusts to accommodate new schools. The research shows that the optimum size of a MAT is between 8 and 12 schools, [as this provides the best level of financial security and stability].

Next, Jason described the way MATs are currently funded. This is done through a process known as ‘top-slicing’. Academies receive money directly from the State and pay either a fixed or variable percentage to their MAT, usually of around 10%, in order to cover the school’s running costs and services.

With this in mind, Jason discussed the research’s findings on procurement practices in MATs. He discovered that Trusts overseeing 2 or 3 schools saw greater centralised purchasing which dropped with MATs of 4-9 schools, and increased again with significantly larger Trusts. This is attributed to the difficulty in which very small and larger groups find sharing and distributing resources. The study demonstrated that utilities and ICT equipment are areas most likely to be centralised, whereas the curriculum and teaching supplies are the least. It appears that schools prefer to set their own learning agenda and curriculum resource providers but find it useful for the MAT to manage some of their other facilities.

Finally, Jason spoke about the areas in which academies are targeting to save schools’ money. With staffing taking up 80-90% of a school’s budget, this is the area most Chief Financial Officers target. With the increase of centralised teaching contracts, and the establishment of ‘Teacher-Training Solutions ’and in-house CPD, academies have the potential to drastically reduce their expenditure.

Danny then opened the floor to questions.

In response to a question on academies’ focus for the next 5 years, Jason talked about the growing centralisation of areas such as SEN, IT and STEM teachers of which there is a serious shortage. He stressed that whilst most teachers were content with the idea of sharing certain facilities, there was a strong desire to remain in control of particular areas, such as the choice of exam boards and core teaching staff, which was unlikely to change.

Lastly, Jason talked about the ‘revolution’ that is surfacing in teacher recruitment. He warned that, with the commission costs taken by recruitment agencies denting schools’ budgets, CFO’s incentive toward centralisation of staffing is on the rise.

With this final thought, Danny thanked the speaker and all the attendees, and brought the meeting to a close.

Older posts «

Fetch more items